Legal Opinion

Cappon v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 13, 1933No. Docket No. 51042PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

McMahon:

This is a proceeding for the redetermination of an asserted deficiency in income tax for the year 1928 in the amount of $263.24.

It is alleged by the petitioner that the respondent erred in disallowing as a deduction from gross income the sum of $2,036.75 representing an insurance premium paid by the petitioner on a policy covering the life of the president and manager of a corporation.

The petitioner is an individual, residing in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

The parties entered into a stipulation as follows:

1. Mary E. Cappon, the petitioner, is the widow of Jesse Cappon, who at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnet v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Dalton v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Kissel v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  4. Van Dyke v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  5. Powell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cappon v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API