Legal Opinion

Henry R. Stoklosa v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1988No. 88-3198PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this FELA case is whether, viewing the facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, there are genuine issues of material fact which preclude the entry of summary judgment for defendant on plaintiff’s negligent infliction of emotional distress claim.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff, Stoklosa, has been employed by defendant, Conrail, since 1982. In April 1983, plaintiff began seeing a psychologist claiming that overwork and belittling comments made by his supervisor resulted in the disruption of his family life and destruction of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Walter D. Adams v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Stewart v. Alton & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API