Heyl Estate
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
By the will of George A. Heyl, life interests in a trust were established for the benefit of his two daughters, Kate Heyl Peace and appellant Mathilde Heyl Jackson. Under its terms they were to receive the net income on his residuary estate payable in equal shares. The will provided: “I direct that all payments of income to each and every of the beneficiaries hereinbefore named, shall be made to them directly, without the power of anticipation or assignment by them and so that tlie same shall not be subject to any judgment, decree, attachment, execution, or other process of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rambo's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Riverside Trust Co. v. TwitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- MacFarlane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Keeler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Harrison's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mahan v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- In re Estate of Creamer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2014