Legal Opinion
In Re Furstenberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 30, 2019No. 18-3158Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
18-3158 In re Furstenberg UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Euromepa S.A. v. R. Esmerian, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.