Legal Opinion

People v. Norton

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1941No. Crim. No. 1773PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appellant was convicted after trial by jury of violation of section 270 of the Penal Code, which provides that a father who wilfully omits without lawful excuse to provide the necessary food, clothing and medical care for his minor child is guilty of a misdemeanor. The appellant was placed on probation for a period of two years on condition that he pay the amount of $15 per month for the support and maintenance of his minor child, Winnie May Norton, with the further condition that he furnish a bond in the amount of $350 as a guarantee for such payments.

This appeal is from the order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. People v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. VogelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. AvingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API