Legal Opinion

Pitt v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. Greenfield, J.

This case raises a question of first impression in this State — is an action brought for a traditional tort which it is claimed resulted in a deprivation of constitutional rights under the elastic concepts of section 1983 of title 42 of the United States Code a new substantive cause of action for which there is no previously prescribed State Statute of Limitations, or is it a new procedural remedy as to which *570the applicable Statute of Limitations for the traditional tort applies?

Plaintiff Thomas Pitt, alleges that in the early morning hours on June…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fields v. Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Bradshaw v. SilversmithNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Fields v. Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API