Legal Opinion

Spruill v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1944No. 4-7406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

The question argued by the parties is whether the complaint and amendments state a cause of action; but we do not reach that question because we hold that there was no final order in the circuit court from which an appeal would lie to this court.

Appellees filed action in the circuit court praying damages .for $1,300 for defendants (appellants’) failure to complete a real estate transaction. There were three amendments to the complaint and also a response to a motion to make more definite and certain: all of which, with the original complaint, made five pleadings seeking to state a cause of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairview Coal Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Reed v. RumphSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hortonv. City of ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API