Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1922No. 7 Div. 726PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; O. A. Steele, Judge. John Ramsey was convicted of larceny, and he appeals. The bill of exceptions should.be stricken. Sections 3019 and 3022, Code 1907. In the absence of the bill of exceptions, the court will not review charges refused. 73 South. 748.

1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.

[1] The motion of the appellee to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause must prevail. The record shows that it was not approved within 90 days from the date it was presented. Sections 3019 and 3020, Code 1907. The ’ appellant was convicted under a complaint which charged him with larceny, and with buying, concealing, receiving,-, or aiding in concealing stolen' property. >-

[2] There being no bill of exceptions, we will not review the action of the trial court in refusing certain written instructions requested by the defendant. Moran v. State, 15 Ala. App. 379, 73 South. 748, 13 Mich.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moran v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Beecham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API