Legal Opinion

In re Mayo

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 29, 1942No. 4640PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from tlie decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 3 to 13, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to air-conditioned barns for curing tobacco.

Appellant’s involved application is for a reissue of his patent No. 2,090,633, issued August 24, 193T, on an application filed December 12, 1935.

Counsel for appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal as to claims 3 to 6, inclusive, and 8. The motion' will be granted. That leaves for our consideration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. Application of George J. Handel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Kinnear v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951
  4. In re McCoyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API