Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Kirkland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 29, 1979No. 20863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

Among the assets coming into the hands of appellant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as the result of the closing of American Bank and Trust Company, was a note in the amount of $127,700.00, signed by Cecil Development Company, Inc., Anthony P. Cecil, and respondent, Stancel E. Kirkland, and secured by a mortgage from Cecil Develop ment Company over certain real property on Hilton Head Island. The note was in default and appellant brought this action to collect the indebtedness through foreclosure of the mortgage and a deficiency judgment against the signers of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bewley-Darst Coal Co. v. Laurens Gin & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Martin v. Traxler Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Point Corp. v. New North Miss. Fed. Sav.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. FIRST AMER. BANK OF VA. v. Litchfield Co. of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Gaffin v. HeymannSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API