Legal Opinion

Yates v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Clay County. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the. court.

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

At a term of the Circuit Court of Clay county held in October 1900, plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted of the larceny of a cow, the property of J. W. Lucas, and from the sentences imposed sued out this writ of error.

I. Before the jurors composing the grand jury that found the indictment! against plaintiffs in error were sworn, the attorney for Thomas Yates interposed in be*179half of his client a challenge to certain members thereof upon the following grounds: First, that J. W. Lucas was the prosecuting witness against Yates; second, that S. F. Hanford was under prosecution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lambright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Blount v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  4. Hudspeth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  5. Bishop v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tarrance v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
  2. Dedge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Gordon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Diehl v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API