Legal Opinion

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Crosby v. Crum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

' Original Application for Writ of Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

HaiNer, J.:

This is an original proceeding in this court brought by the territory, on relation of Herbert D„ Crosby, county attorney oi Caddo county, against Charles L. Crura, as probate judge of said county, to compel the defendant, ás such probate judge, to report to the board of county commissioners all fees ■ collected and received by him in entering townsites and conveying the same to the occupants thereof, and at the same time to pay into the county treasury all fees received by him in such matters in excess of the amount allowed him by law as his annual salary,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Redfield v. WindomSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bayard v. United States Ex Rel. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Collet v. AllisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1890
  4. Steward v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Shawnee v. City of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. City of Guthrie v. Stewart, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Payne v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Krutz v. Washington Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Stevens v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API