Bailey v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Montgomery City Court. Heard before Hon. W. H. Thomas. Ed Bailey was convicted of obtaining money under false pretense from the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a corporation, and he appeals. The indictment was not subject to the demurrers interposed. — White v. The State, 86 Ala. 69; State v. Houl(lah, 78 Minn. 524; Stater. Turvey, 142 Mo. 402; 19 Gye. 425.
1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.
The appellant was tried and convicted on an indictment for obtaining money under false pretenses. The indictment is in Code form. — Cr. Code 1907, p. 670, form No. 58. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and the only question presented for our consideration is the one raised by the demurrer to the indictment. The demurrer takes the point that the in*5•dictment fails to allege the name-of any person to whom any false representation was made, but instead thereof alleges that the false pretense was made to the Louisville & Nashville Bailroad Company, a corporation.
So far as we are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- State v. TurleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State v. HulderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turnipseed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Bazzell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- Horne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Lambert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Horne v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.