Legal Opinion

Comstock v. McCrary

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 6, 2005No. 03-2318UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Carolyn Comstock brought suit on behalf of the estate of Billy Wade Montgomery, alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment and state tort law by prison psychologist Norris McCrary. The district court denied Comstock’s motion for judgment as a matter of law and the jury returned a verdict in favor of McCrary. We review Comstock’s appeal of the district court’s denial of her preverdict motion for judgment as a matter of law to determine “whether there was sufficient evidence to raise a material question of fact for the jury.” Frost v. Hawkins…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cathie Allison, Debbie Conlin, Melissa Granger, Evette Chavez, Susan Pavick, Melissa Del Rio and Amanda Mead v. City of East LansingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Allison v. East LansingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API