Legal Opinion

Freeling v. Sebring

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1961No. 6688PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing, for want of federal jurisdiction, an action based on the existence of a substantial question arising under the laws of the United States.

The pertinent facts are that Appellee-Sebring, acting in his capacity as Oklahoma State Banking Commissioner, closed the Capitol Hill State Bank and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (F.D.I.C.) as liquidating agent therefor. Appellant-Freeling is a depositor, stockholder and the deposed president of the bank. The appointment of the F.D.I.C. to act for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sprowls v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of San Francisco National Bank v. David M. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a United States Corporation v. Bank of Boulder, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. W. Jerome AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. William W. Godshall and Martha D. GodshallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API