Legal Opinion

People v. Saul S.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1985No. F003379PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAMLIN, Acting P. J.

On March 18, 1981, a petition was filed with the juvenile court to adjudicate respondent Saul S. a ward of the court under section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code (hereafter juvenile petition). The juvenile petition alleged that respondent had committed robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) 1 and attempted murder (§§ 664/187) of Rose Carolyn Kreisel. It also alleged, based on these offenses, a violation of the court’s previous order releasing respondent on probation. Finally, the petition alleged that respondent intentionally inflicted great bodily injury during the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. . ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. BivensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. In Re GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Waddy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. In Re GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API