Legal Opinion

McCollum v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 26, 1994No. 93-2837Published

1Opinion of the Court

MICKLE, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences except for the order of restitution payable to Popeye’s Chicken located at 2143 Edgewood Avenue West. Appellant did not enter a plea to, nor was he otherwise convicted of, the charge of burglary against this establishment. Therefore, restitution for any losses incurred with respect thereto was improperly ordered. See In the Interest of F.P., 615 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); McBride v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); S.T.N. v. State, 474 So.2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The state concedes error on this point. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of S.T.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Nix v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. McBride v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. In the Interest of F.P.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API