Legal Opinion

Walker v. Karpan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1986No. 85-240PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented in this case is whether Marcia Walker should have been afforded a hearing prior to the termination of benefits for her and her minor son under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. The Department of Health and Social Services (Department) denied a hearing after furnishing notice to Marcia Walker of the termination of benefits and of her opportunity to request a hearing, and that action was affirmed by order of the district court upon a petition for review presented by Walker. We hold that given the circumstances reflected…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Goss v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Estate of Dahlke ex rel. Jubie v. DahlkeWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Workers' Compensation Claim of Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Coleman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API