Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Kavanagh

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 12, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in ease for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court Effingham county; the Hon. Thomas M. Jett, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

It is first insisted by appellants that the declaration does not state a cause of action. There is no averment in this declaration that any one or more of the defendants possessed, owned, used, operated or maintained the particular wire in question by contact with which the appellee was injured. There is no averment that the wire contained any particular defects, or that it was in any way negligently strung, badly insulated, or improperly attached to the poles by the defendants or any of them. There is no averment of actual or constructive notice to the defendants of any defects or dangers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAndrews v. Chicago, Lake Shore & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Bahr v. National Safe Deposit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Field v. FrenchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Chicago Telephone Co. v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  5. Morrow v. LanganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoxsey v. St. Louis & Springfield Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API