Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re the Marriage of Eagen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 18, 1981No. 82278, CA 18270Published
1DissentWarren, J.
I dissent, not because the result reached by the trial court and the majority in this court has not done what is fair in the abstract, but because I believe that under ORS 107.135(2), the court was without power to grant relief as to the accrued installments. ORS 107.135(2) provides:
*305"(2) The decree is a final judgment as to any instalment or payment of money which has accrued up to the time either party makes a motion to set aside, alter or modify the decree, and the court does not have the power to set aside, alter or modify such decree, or any portion thereof, which provides for any payment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Poe v. PoeOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Shelley v. ShelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- In re the Marriage of AlspaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- In re the Marriage of CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.