Legal Opinion

Paccar Financial Corp. v. Hummell

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1980No. CA 80-231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The appellee claimed the appellant had unlawfully taken from the appellee a tractor-trailer rig and had given notice to the appellee that it was to be sold at a certain time because it was collateral for a debt of the appellee which was unpaid. The appellant is allegedly assignee of a sales contract pursuant to which the appellee purchased the rig in question. In addition to asking for a return of the rig and other personalty allegedly taken, the appellee sought compensatory and punitive damages. The appellee demanded a jury trial and asked the circuit court to grant a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ahrent v. SpragueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  2. Jones v. BartlettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Intl. Union v. Earle Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Smith v. American Trucking Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Fort Smith Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Fort Smith Symphony Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Intl. Union v. Earle Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API