Mayo v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
The defendant, William Mayo, Jr., appeals his convictions for Rape as a Class A felony, Burglary as a Class A felony, Confinement as a Class B felony, and the imposition of a habitual offender enhancement. Under the sentencing statutes in force at the time of the crime, the trial court imposed the presumptive ten year sentence on the Class B felony and found aggravating factors warranting the addition of five years to the presumptive twenty-five year sentences for each of the Class A felonies. The court then applied a thirty year habitual offender enhancement to the rape…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Hammons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Riley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Parker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Poore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Crown Point v. Misty Woods Properties, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.