Legal Opinion

Mayo v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1997No. 19S00-9609-CR-596PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

The defendant, William Mayo, Jr., appeals his convictions for Rape as a Class A felony, Burglary as a Class A felony, Confinement as a Class B felony, and the imposition of a habitual offender enhancement. Under the sentencing statutes in force at the time of the crime, the trial court imposed the presumptive ten year sentence on the Class B felony and found aggravating factors warranting the addition of five years to the presumptive twenty-five year sentences for each of the Class A felonies. The court then applied a thirty year habitual offender enhancement to the rape…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hammons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Riley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Parker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Poore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Crown Point v. Misty Woods Properties, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API