State v. Pavlik
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Korsmo, A.C.J.
¶1 Aleksandr Pavlik challenges his conviction for first degree assault, arguing that the trial court erred by excluding his spontaneous statement to police. While it is unclear that the trial court erred, it is *647quite clear that the alleged error was harmless. The conviction is affirmed.
FACTS
¶2 The participants agree on the general outline of the incident, although their views vary in some particular details. Mr. Pavlik was driving in Spokane southbound on Perry Street near the Avista facilities in order to reach Hamilton Street and enter the freeway. It was nearly 1:00 a.m. on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. ZubiateColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- State Of Washington v. Christopher T. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Shomari Mashinda JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington, V Marcos Roberto LozanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, V Richard Alan Lucas, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.