Legal Opinion
Kantor Bros. v. Wile
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Motion to punish a third party herein for alleged contempt.
1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.
This motion is made to punish one of the officers of the Bank for Savings, a third party herein, for alleged contempt of court for his disobedience of one of the mandates of this court, as a résult of which the judgment creditor contends his rights and remedies have been impeded, impaired and prejudiced. From the facts disclosed by the papers it appears that the plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, for the sum of $1,027.91; that the judgment-roll was duly filed in said court; a transcript of said judgment was duly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- People v. Mechanics & Traders' Savings InstitutionNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- West Side Bank v. . PugsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Manhattan Sav. Inst.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ecker v. MyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1922
- Rosenberg v. Gamma Chapter, Pi Lambda Phi Fraternity, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1929