Legal Opinion
Ostrovsky v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William C. Donnino, J.
Defendants Dante Caputo and Emily Caputo move for summary judgment in their favor and to dismiss the complaint and cross claims against them. Defendant Roadway Contracting opposes that motion and cross-moves for summary judgment and dismissal in its favor. Defendant Consolidated Edison (Con Ed) opposes the Caputos’ and Roadway’s motions and cross-moves for summary judgment and dismissal in its favor. Thus, three of the six sets of defendants move for summary judgment and dismissal.1 The plaintiff opposes all the above motions and cross motions.
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Shapiro v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ostrovsky v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Rhoda Mandel, et al. v. Fizzbin, LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026