Legal Opinion

Young-Hatten v. Taylor, 08ap-511 (3-17-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2009No. 08AP-511PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Jerrie Young-Hatten ("Young-Hatten") and her husband, Luddie Hatten ("appellants"), appeal from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court entered judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant-appellee, AmySue Taylor ("appellee"), on appellants' claim for legal malpractice.

{¶ 2} The relevant factual and procedural history taken from the record follows. On September 3, 2004, Young-Hatten underwent a laparoscopic oopherectomy, a procedure in which both ovaries are removed. Dr. Carol Jenkins ("Dr. Jenkins") performed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Bader v. FerriOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Clements v. Lima Mem. Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Reece v. Davis-WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API