Young-Hatten v. Taylor, 08ap-511 (3-17-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Jerrie Young-Hatten ("Young-Hatten") and her husband, Luddie Hatten ("appellants"), appeal from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court entered judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant-appellee, AmySue Taylor ("appellee"), on appellants' claim for legal malpractice.
{¶ 2} The relevant factual and procedural history taken from the record follows. On September 3, 2004, Young-Hatten underwent a laparoscopic oopherectomy, a procedure in which both ovaries are removed. Dr. Carol Jenkins ("Dr. Jenkins") performed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Bader v. FerriOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Clements v. Lima Mem. Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Reece v. Davis-WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2026