Legal Opinion

Williams v. . Carr

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1879PublishedCited by 15 opinions

CoNTR.ovef.sy submitted without action under the Code § 315, at Pall Term, 1878, of Epgecombe Superior Court, to Seymour, J. The case is sufficiently stated by The Chief Justice. His Honor gave judgment for plaintiffs and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, O, J,

This is a controversy submitted without action under C. O. P. § 315 on a case agreed, the substantial facts of which are these;

The action is to recover the value of a promissory note given by the defendant’s intestate and moneys paid by the plaintiffs to the use of the intestate, the aggregate amount -of which, due February 24th, 1878, is $8,419.38. The consideration of the indebtedness was successive losses sustained on time contracts-for the purchase of cotton, made on his behalf by the plaintiffs and paid by them at his request, and for charges and expenses incurred in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Warren, Lane & Co. v. HewittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Russell H. Kingsbury v. . William R. SuitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fast v. GulleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Cannaday v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Whitesides v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wall v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Bryant v. Western Union Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API