Venet v. Local Union No. 606, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
The plaintiff has brought this action against Local Union No. 606, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Virginia, Minnesota, to set aside an election of the Union’s Business Representative alleging a denial of his right to nominate and to participate in an election in direct violation of 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. Defendant brought a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction predicated upon Title IV, 29 U.S.C. §§ 482, 483. The court took the motion under advisement since the case was being tried to the court, and heard evidence produced by both of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Calhoon v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wade S. McGuire v. Grand International Division of the Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Clarence L. Davis, Jr., and Wilfred Harris v. Walter Turner, C. C. Powell, Joe Carbonaro, Joseph v. Moreschi, and Paul L. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- O'BRIEN v. PaddockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Shultz v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kupau v. YamamotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Walter H. Kupau, Gordon Yanagawa, and Robert Oyadomari v. Masayuki Yamamoto, Stanley Ito, William Sidell, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 745, Afl-Cio, and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local Union No. 745, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio, and Walter H. Kupau, Applicants for Intervention, Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local Union No. 745, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio, and Walter H. Kupau, Applicants for InterventionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980