Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Pavlik

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 2011No. 29172-3-IIIPublished

1DissentSweeney, J.

¶32 (dissenting) — Officer Stephen Arredondo approached Aleksandr Pavlik immediately following this shooting. Mr. Pavlik said, ‘You saw that, it was in self-defense.” He said to Officer Zachary Dahle, “It was self defense, he was punching me” and “[r]elax guys, I have a concealed pistol license.” Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 47. And he told Officer David Daddato at the scene, “[y]ou saw him punching me in the face! I shot him in defense!” CP at 47. He reported again to Detective Chet Gilmore that he shot in self-defense and said that he tried to aim for a “not fatal area.” CP at 47.

¶33 Not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API