Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 25, 1912No. 8271Published

Before Memminger, J., Anderson, January term, 1912. Indictment against George Johnson and Enoch Ware. Defendants appeal. cite: Does a subpoena hold good until revoked or case triedf Crim. Code 45; 47 S. E. 535; 10 Jur. N. S. 33; 31 So. 1011; 32 N. C. 41.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

The agreed statement of facts in the case show that the appellants were tried and convicted in their absence of violating the dispensary law in the Court of General Sessions for Anderson county, at the January term of Court, 1912, and duly sentenced by his Honor, Judge Memminger. The indictment was found against them at the September term of Court, 1911, and the case was continued by the State at that time. All of the defendants’ witnesses were present, having been regularly subpoenaed. When the case was continued the solicitor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  2. Latimer v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API