Rylander v. B & a Marketing Co. Ex Rel. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
MARILYN ABOUSSIE, Chief Justice.
Appellee B & A Marketing Company, by and through its successor-in-interest Atlantic Richfield Company (“B & A”), sued the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and the Texas Attorney General (collectively, “the Comptroller”), 1 for a refund of “additional tax” paid under protest. Both parties moved for summary judgment; the trial court granted B & A’s motion in all respects and denied the Comptroller’s motion in all respects. The Comptroller now appeals the trial court judgment. We will reverse the trial court judgment and render judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rylander v. Fisher Controls International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Upjohn Co. v. Rylander, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Richard Hebert and Janet Hebert v. Timothy E. Hopkins, M.D., and Shannon Clinic, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
- TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. Combs, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Patel v. Texas Department of Licensing & RegulationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.