Hardy v. State

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In the statement of the case in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error the following appears: “The evidence for the State was to the effect that the defendant shot deceased without sufficient provocation and not in self-defense, but because he became incensed at the deceased when some of the negroes in the quarter said something to him as he passed through the section quarters on the way to his hoúse, and that when defendant came back on his way to Stone Mountain, he shot Gilliam, after having a few words with him, and without Gilliam making any…