Legal Opinion
United States v. Farina
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 19, 1957No. Civ. 124-57PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. 1 Upon a motion of this nature the Court is only justified in dismissing a complaint for legal insufficiency when, “it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim.” Continental Collieries v. Shober, 3 Cir., 1942, 130 F.2d 631, 635; Leimer v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co., 8…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Martin TiegerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Stanley N. Howell, Warren S. Cochran, Cochran & Howell, a Partnership, Post Cleaners, Thrifty CleanersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Graham v. Forrest City Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- O. C. Kinney, Inc. v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- United States v. LawsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Bettis v. Odebrecht Contractors of California, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.