Legal Opinion
United States v. Caine
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 18, 2007No. 1:07-po-00169PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO SUPPRESS
SOROKIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Stacy Caine requests that the Court “suppress all evidence seized as a result of an unlawful request to exit the vehicle” and “suppress the results of the breath test performed [on] the defendant.” The government opposes. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Docket # 4) is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket # 5), which also seeks suppression, is DENIED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed, according to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ChhienCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vondrak v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Amundsen v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. RomeroDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Byrnes v. City of ManchesterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- United States v. Hamblen-BairdDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.