Legal Opinion
Tommie Bullock v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1998No. 98-2382PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). We affirm.
On August 20,1997, Tommie Bullock, Ceo-la Carter, Aaron Johnson, Loretta Lourick, Seneca McIntosh, Lyndie McRoberts, Elmer Webb, Betty Williams, and Paulette Williams filed a pro se complaint. On January 6, the District Court 1 noted that there was no proof of service or entry of appearance for any of the defendants, and that service of the complaint had not been made within 120 days of filing as required by Rule 4(m). The Court ordered plaintiffs to show cause within…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Systems Signs Supplies, Jahurett Castrillon v. United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Moore v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Herman K. Edwards v. Julia Edwards John Edwards Robert Lee Edwards Milderine (Shannon) Edwards Gloria (Edwards) ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bullock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Dominic Young and Princeton Young v. Alexander Walls, Moshe Davis, Michael Wegner, Jeremy Riley, Davis Mueller, David Mathes, and City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- Martin S. Almaraz v. Harrah's CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001