Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1952No. 35343Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court, and on January 23, 1952, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Fore v. Fore, 203 Okla. 75, 218 P. 2d 366, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the judgment may be reversed.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fore v. ForeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API