Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Walsh

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*908OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

Petitions numbered 59 on the calendar of December 12, 1981 (Index No. 22706/81) and 149 on the calendar of January 25, 1982 (Index No. 22704/81) are consolidated herein for disposition. Petitioner Allstate Insurance Company seeks to permanently stay the respondents from proceeding to arbitration pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd [c]) on the ground that no arbitrable controversy exists.

FACTS

On November 27, 1980, respondents Lawrence Walsh, Eugene Tobin and William Temple, all of whom are New York residents, were passengers in an automobile owned by Betty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Draper v. Oswego County Fire Relief Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Country-Wide Insurance v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Wierbinski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Country-Wide Insurance v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tate v. Charles Aguillard Ins. & Real Est.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Lee v. SaligaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Allcity Insurance v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. American Transit Ins. v. AbdelghanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Etkind, P. C. v. Allstate InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API