Legal Opinion
Gill v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 12, 2012No. 09-CV-6043CJSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
By Order of Hon. Charles J. Siragusa, United States District Judge, dated September 30, 2009, all pretrial matters in the above-captioned ease have been referred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(A)-(B). (Docket #27).
Plaintiffs Daniel Gill, Thomas McDermott and Jay Holmes have filed this action against defendants Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I, Bausch & Lomb, Inc., and the Compensation Committee of the Bausch & Lomb Board of Directors, under the Employee Retirement Income…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. Donald E. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cleary v. Kaleida HealthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
- Popovchak, et al. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026