In the Matter of The Amendment of The commission's Rule Regarding Applications for the Certificates of Convenience and Necessity Kansas City Power and Light and KCP&L Missouri Operations Company v. Missouri Public Service Commission and Dogwood Energy
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENDMENT ) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULE REGARDING ) APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OF ) CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY; KANSAS ) CITY POWER AND LIGHT AND KCP&L ) GREATER MISSOURI OPERATIONS ) COMPANY, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) WD82182 ) MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) Opinion filed: June 28, 2019 AND DOGWOOD ENERGY, ) ) Respondents. ) APPEAL FROM THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Before Division Three: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge Kansas City Power & Light Company…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State ex inf. Barker v. Kansas City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Praxair, Inc. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Harline v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- State Ex Rel. MoGas Pipeline LLC v. Missouri Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Armco Steel v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.