Beem v. McKune
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1ConcurrenceO’Brien, Circuit Judge
with whom PAUL KELLY, Jr. and HARTZ, Circuit Judges, join.
I fully concur with the result reached by the majority and have no quarrel with its reasoning or the grounds upon which it rests the decision. I write separately only because addressing these appeals on the merits cloaks the arguments with undeserved dignity. This case is not about guilt or innocence; without question, these defendants molested children. It is not about process; both men have enjoyed a full measure. It is about Justice, writ large. It tests systemic resistance to abuse. It exceeds elastic limits.
Judicial estoppel is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.