Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Beem v. McKune

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2003No. Nos. 00-3224, 00-3249Published

1ConcurrenceO’Brien, Circuit Judge

with whom PAUL KELLY, Jr. and HARTZ, Circuit Judges, join.

I fully concur with the result reached by the majority and have no quarrel with its reasoning or the grounds upon which it rests the decision. I write separately only because addressing these appeals on the merits cloaks the arguments with undeserved dignity. This case is not about guilt or innocence; without question, these defendants molested children. It is not about process; both men have enjoyed a full measure. It is about Justice, writ large. It tests systemic resistance to abuse. It exceeds elastic limits.

Judicial estoppel is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API