Legal Opinion

Schenback v. United Frontier Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1789Memorandum: This appeal arises from an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (b) to recover from defendant-interpleader plaintiff, United Frontier Mutual Insurance Company (United), the amount of a default judgment that plaintiffs obtained against interpleader defendant, Eric Prutsman. Prutsman’s parents were insured by United and, pursuant to the terms of the policy, Prutsman also would be covered if he resided in his parents’ household. United appeals from an order that, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their complaint, determining that Prutsman is an insured…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Canfield v. Peerless InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. PaolicelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & GaliotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Konstantinou v. Phoenix InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API