Legal Opinion

Gardiner v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1909No. 15,874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from tlie the district court for Douglas county: Lee S. Estelle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a suit to enjoin the collection of a paving assessment of $80.64, which had been levied against a lot owned by plaintiff in the city of Omaha. Invalidity of a curative statute authorizing the assessment is the ground on which the injunction is sought. The district court upheld the act and sustained a demurrer to the petition. From a dismissal of the action plaintiff has appealed.

The following statements are summarized from the petition: In 1898 defendant levied against plaintiff’s lot a void paving assessment which was canceled by a decree of the district court for Douglas county in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hall v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. State ex rel. Dawson County v. Farmers & Merchants Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Krittenbrink v. WithnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Byron Reed Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API