Legal Opinion

Berner v. Kuzinski

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1948Published

1Opinion of the CourtStoddart, J.

Action to foreclose a mortgage. The evidence reveals that in April, 1941, the plaintiffs and the Warwick Savings Bank held mortgages on premises owned by Stephen E. Donohue. After a default by Donohue in the payment of interest due upon the bond secured by a first mortgage, the Warwick Savings Bank commenced an action in July of 1941 to foreclose its mortgage. Through error, the plaintiffs, who owned a second mortgage, were not made parties to that action. The property was conveyed at the foreclosure sale in November, 1941, to the Warwick Savings Bank, and in February, 1942, that bank…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moulton v. . CornishNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Townshend v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Denton v. Ontario County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Siegel v. AtterburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Siegel v. AtterburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API