Chandler v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Violating Prohibition Lem. Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court-. Heard before H'on. T. L. Sowell. J. N. Chandler was convicted of violating the prohibition law and he appeals. — No brief came to the Reporter. — The court cannot consider the motion to quash and the rulings thereon because not shoAvn by the bill of exceptions. — Jones v. City of Anniston, 138 Ala. 199. The court properly admitted evidence of the Amlue of the checks. — Wilson v. The State, 113 Ala. 104.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans,j.
— The motion to quash the AAmrrant, made by the defendant in the court below, cannot be here considered, for the reason that neither the motion, nor ruling of the court thereon, appear in the bill of exceptions. — Jones v. City of Anniston, 138 Ala. 199, 35 South. 112. Indeed, the record does not show that the court ruled on the motion.
The affidavit and Avarrant upon Avhich defendant Avas tried were of date May 28, 1909. The case urns tried by the judgment entry, on June 8, 1909. J. J. Burnett Avas the only witness for the state, and testified on direct examination that he kneAV the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Gardner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Pearce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Collier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.