Legal Opinion

Sidran v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 26, 2003No. 3D01-2229Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing Denied

Before COPE, C.J., and LEVY and SUAREZ *, JJ.

2Per curiam

Dupont has moved for rehearing, contending that we misunderstood theories of defense and applied incorrect legal standards. We deny rehearing, but clarify our reasons for reversing the judgment.

The Sidrans used Benlate DF from 1988 through February 1991. As explained in the initial opinion, the plants’ health declined during this period of time.

In May 1991, the Sidrans received a notice from Dupont indicating that Benlate DF had been recalled. The recall notice stated, in part:

The recall was initiated because trace levels of…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. LevalleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API