Legal Opinion

Stolorow v. City of Pontiac

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1954No. Docket 54, Calendar 46,044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Appellants sought an injunction preventing the city of Pontiac from appropriating and expending $157,890 for the acquisition and development of city owned and operated parking lots.

Defendant city of Pontiac in its cross bill-requested that the court decree:

1. That said appropriation ordinance was not subject to referendum; and

2. That the Pontiac city commission was not required to enact ah ordinance prohibiting all city officials from expending any public funds for the acquisition or development of city owned parking lots, or, in lieu of such action, submitting said proposal to a vote of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wayne Village President v. Wayne Village ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. McVeigh v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People Ex Rel. Schlaeger v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. McRobie v. Mayor and Commissioners of WesternportCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Thomson v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API