Legal Opinion
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided November 20, 2003No. 03-03-00229-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.
Appellant Phillips Petroleum Company (“Phillips”) contends by one issue that the district court erred in affirming a decision by appellee Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 1 to grant nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions allowances for eight boilers to appellee Sweeny Cogeneration Limited Partnership (“SCLP”). Phillips claimed entitlement to the allowances as the owner of the boilers, whereas SCLP claimed entitlement because it controlled the boilers in a cogeneration facility that it operated within Phillips’s refinery. Phillips argues that the Commission…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Public Utility Commission v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Public Utility Com'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- USA Waste Services of Houston, Inc. v. Strayhorn, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- BP Chemicals, Inc. v. AEP Texas Central Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Corpus Christi Housing Authority v. Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Blue Skies Alliance v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
- Southwestern Electric Power Company v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.