Legal Opinion
People v. Maddox
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied without a hearing the motion of defendant to vacate the judgment of conviction. Defendant contends that two computer printouts obtained from the City of Rochester under the Freedom of Information Law after trial constitute newly discovered evidence and that the People’s failure to provide the printouts constitutes a Brady violation (see, CPL 440.10 [1] [g], [h]). The printouts set forth the car assignments for the two uniformed police officers who arrested defendant and disclose that the officers, at some point on the day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. ChinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. WillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. FyffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DishawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. CrislerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. CrislerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003