Legal Opinion

Nannizzi v. Caprile

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1919No. Civ. No. 2886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edmund P. Mogan, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

In a suit for partnership accounting, dissolution, sale, and distribution of the assets, it was adjudged there had been full accounting and dissolution. The appellants are satisfied with that portion of the judgment. Upon findings, supported by evidence, that the plaintiff partners had agreed with the defendant partners that the partnership should be dissolved and its property merged with that of other partnerships engaged in the same line of business, in a consolidation under a corporation to be formed, and that the partners should receive respectively stock in the corporation at par,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scadden Flat Gold Mining Co. v. ScaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Garretson v. Pacific Crude Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Michell v. Grass Valley Gold Mines Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Central Heights Improvement Co. v. Memorial Parks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Miles, Inc. v. Scripps Clinic & Research FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1993
  5. Harlie R. Norris Co., Ltd. v. LovettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API