Phipps v. Kelly
Oregon Supreme Court
Douglas County. Defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
The defendants were husband and wife. The plaintiff, who is the assignee of Marks & Co., bases his right to relief upon the grounds, (1) that the indebtedness, consisting of a promissory note, book-account, and goods, wares, and merchandise, which were sold and delivered as future advances, was by agreement of the parties secured by a deed intended to operate as a mortgage, and executed ■ by the defendants upon the separate property of the wife; (2) that the whole amount of such indebtedness was made and incurred for expenses of the family in the purchase of goods, wares, and .merchandise by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woollen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Grand Chute v. WinegarSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Fleischner v. Citizens' Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Templeton v. BocklerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Willis v. CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Love v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.